Alvaro Lopez
Alvaro Lopez is a cultural analyst and researcher at ASCA (Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis), University of Amsterdam. His fields are psychoanalysis and media studies within the scope of Cultural Analysis. In his research, he examines the shifting relationship between horror media, contemporary cultural anxieties, and identity on the global landscape.
THE MONSTER ENTERS THE GLOBAL STAGE: HORROR, MONSTROSITY, AND IDENTITY ON THE GLOBAL LANDSCAPE
Why is horror such an alluring genre across cultures and societies? What is the social role of “the monster”? And how do horror and monstrosity relate to our individual and shared experiences and (cultural) identities? In this talk, Alvaro Lopez will discuss the role of horror and the monster as a genre and a figure with deep sociocultural implications across history and cultures. He will move from traditional representations of monstrosity to contemporary deployments of horror in the media, to examine the changing relationship between horror and identity on the global landscape.
Timo Istace
Timo Istace is a PhD researcher at the University of Antwerp and an associate researcher at the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. His expertise spans human rights law, medical law, (bio)ethics, and philosophy of law. His research focuses on the human rights protection of the human mind in the context of emerging technologies, with a particular emphasis on neurotechnology.
Protecting the Mind: Human Rights in the Age of Neurotechnology
Recent advancements in neurotechnology have captured significant public attention, driven in large part by high-profile media campaigns from companies like Neuralink. These developments generate both excitement and concern, as they push the boundaries of what technology can achieve through interaction with the human brain. Devices capable of monitoring and influencing brain activity have raised pressing concerns about the inviolability of the human mind. While concepts like neurotechnological “mindreading” or “mindsteering” are more science fiction than reality, and much of the hype can be considered overly alarmistic, the ethical and legal questions they raise are real. Neurotechnologies could potentially translate brain activity into insights about our thoughts, emotions, or intentions. Could this pose a new threat to the right to privacy? Similarly, how can we protect the right to freedom of thought when tools that influence mental processes through stimulation of the brain become widely available?
This presentation will explore these critical concerns, focusing on the intersection of neurotechnology and human rights law. It will discuss the challenges and opportunities in ensuring these technologies are developed and deployed responsibly, with human rights serving as a guiding framework to protect mental privacy, autonomy, and integrity in an era of unprecedented technological capability.
Maarten Boudry
Dr. Maarten Boudry is a philosopher of science and first holder of the Etienne Vermeersch Chair of Critical Thinking at Ghent University. He published over 50 papers in academic journals on pseudoscience, cultural evolution, conspiracy theories, climate policy, science and religion, reasoning fallacies, metaphors in science, and evolutionary epistemology. Together with Massimo Pigliucci, he edited the collections Science Unlimited? On the Challenges of Scientism (2018) and Philosophy of Pseudoscience. Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem (2013). He also wrote six books in Dutch on science and philosophy for the general audience, and has written essays for Quillette, The Independent, The New York Times (The Stone), Areo Magazine, Le Point, Die Welt, and other newspapers.
How Not to Fall Into an Intellectual Black Hole: On the Allure of Conspiracy Theories
Some conspiracies are real, as any historian will tell you, but people believe in many more unfounded conspiracy theories than there are actual conspiracies to go around. Some of these unfounded conspiracy theories, such as anti-vaccination scares or QAnon, have become major public concerns. Everyone is susceptible to conspiracy thinking—intelligent and educated people no less. What explains the remarkable cultural success of some conspiracy theories, despite their implausibility? And how can we protect ourselves against their allure? By understanding what makes them tick, or so I propose. In my talk, I describe the inner logic of conspiracy thinking, developing a simple recipe to generate conspiracies around any event from your local newspaper or from history books. Anyone can make their own conspiracy theory! In fact, we have developed an automatized Conspiracy Generator, using the power of AI. With this generator, you can fabricate multiple and contradictory conspiracy theories around any given event, using a few simple parameters.
